To main content
Norsk
Publications

Why is the multiple stressor concept of relevance to radioecology?

Academic article
Year of publication
2019
Journal
International Journal of Radiation Biology
External websites
Cristin
Doi
Involved from NIVA
Knut Erik Tollefsen
Contributors
B Salbu, H C Teien, O C Lind, K E Tollefsen

Summary

Purpose: A number of nuclear and radiological sources have contributed or are still contributing to the release of a series of stressors such as radionuclides in combination with trace metals and even organic chemicals. To assess the impact of mixed contamination, a limited number of stressors are usually evaluated one by one. We have therefore evaluated the benefit of using the multiple stressor concept focusing on key topics within radioecology such as the source term and deposition, ecosystem interactions and exposure, biological uptake and effects including adverse outcome pathways (AOPs), as a basis for assessing impact and risk. Materials and methods: We have extracted information from highly relevant scientific articles (e.g. Web of Science) describing multiple stressor exposure experiments where at least one stressor is ionizing radioactivity such as low dose gamma radiation or radionuclides (e.g. fission or activation products; uranium and daughter nuclides). In addition, experiences obtained during recent years at the author´s laboratories are included in the discussions, especially when it comes to speciation issues, combined effects, risk estimates, and AOPs. Results: The multiple stressor concept is not only related to the total concentration of a series of radionuclides and other stressors released from one source or from different sources, but also related to the presence of different physico-chemical forms of individual radionuclides. Due to interactions, the ecosystem transfer to biota is dynamic, and the application of toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics considerations seems most useful. Although there is a limited number of articles dealing with multiple stressors in which ionizing radiation is included as one of the stressors, deviation from concentration (dose) additive responses should probably be expected, especially under field conditions where additional abiotic as well as biotic interactions take place Conclusions: Following severe nuclear events, releases can be described as a massive multiple stressor exposure containing radionuclides combined with other stressors. Thus, advanced characterization technologies are needed for parameterization of the mixed stressor source term as input to ecosystem transport, dose, and impact models. To reduce uncertainties in assessments of these complex exposures, advanced technologies and computational efforts to link internal distributions to responses are also needed to understand how multiple stressor exposure could affect toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics, and why combined exposures could depart from additivity along the source–adverse outcome continuum.