Search everything
MONIS6 (‘Monitoring of non-indigenous species’ 6), Status of environmental DNA monitoring in marine areas under the NOVANA program for 2017 to 2023
Using species-specific detection of environmental DNA (abbreviated as ‘eDNA’), we report here on findings in Danish waters of non-indigenous marine species for the period 2017 to 2023.
Christian Vogelsang
Rolf David Vogt
Øyvind Kaste
Call for Ethics Advisor
Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA) hereby announce tender competition for an independent external “Ethics Advisor” for a HORIZON project for which NIVA is the coordinator.
Scholarships and students
Microalgae
The section bridges fundamental knowledge and technology, industry, stakeholders, and consumers.
Algeco
ALGECO (Cost-effective algae technology to promote circular economy development of Norwegian wastewater treatment plants) provides a scientific blueprint for a new paradigm of bioeconomy for Norwegian wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). We aim to transform municipal treated wastewater from waste into algae-based products by developing and implementing innovative, cost-effective and viable algae technologies.
Anette Engesmo
Marta Moyano
Sandra Stadniczenko Gran
CHAMBITION
China is an increasingly central actor in global environmental governance. CHAMBITION aims to elucidate China’s role in international environmental cooperation through examining the positions the country assumes in global environmental governance and the domestic and international drivers accounting for these positions.
ØKOFERSK
The purpose of the monitoring program is to provide reference data from unaffected water bodies against which impacts can be assessed, to monitor long-term changes in natural conditions and large-scale human impact, and to monitor acidification effects in freshwater in Norway as a result of atmospheric inputs of long-range transported air pollutants.
Comparison of Environmental DNA Detection Using qPCR and ddPCR
Detection of environmental DNA from marine invasive species can be done using quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) and droplet digital Polymerase Chain Reaction. Here we compare these two platforms for 17 very different organisms and show that ddPCR provides higher precision and can reduce sample analysis time.
Sara Noémie Plassnig
Maximilian Nawrath
Emmy Falk Nøklebye
Kathrine Ivsett Johnsen
Frode Sundnes